Thessaloniki, Greece · Limited traffic zone
Official name Τροποποίηση του εγκεκριμένου ρυμοτομικού σχεδίου του Δήμου Θεσσαλονίκης για τον καθορισμό τμήματος της οδού Ασημάκη Φωτήλα, μεταξύ των οδών Κατσάνου και Παπαδιαμαντοπούλου, ως πεζόδρομου (ΦΕΚ Δ' 749/01.11.2024), με την έγκριση του αποκλεισμού της κυκλοφορίας οχημάτων (ΦΕΚ Β' 1828/26.03.2024)
In force in Thessaloniki right nowTuesday, 13 October 2026 at 12:05 · Europe/Athens
The empty window list is the instrument's own shape and not a missing fact. A town-planning amendment converts a street permanently; ΦΕΚ Δ' 749/01.11.2024 prints no season, no weekday and no hour, so a verdict of "in force" is correct at every hour of every day. 🚫 It must not be read as a timetable this project failed to find.
🚨 This says what the stretch legally is; it cannot tell you what is on the ground. The traffic act's own words are that its regulations «εφαρμόζονται με την τοποθέτηση - εγκατάσταση της σχετικής κατακόρυφης - οριζόντιας σήμανσης» — they are applied when the signs and markings are installed — and no published act names when that happened or whether it has. The plan amendment is the authority for the character of the street; the sign at the kerb is what you will be reading when you drive it.
🚨 The exemptions are real, they are now sourced, and this encoding still cannot see them — so the rule above still over-warns, and it does so on purpose. The municipality's «ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΑΣ ΠΕΖΟΔΡΟΜΩΝ ΔΗΜΟΥ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ» (council decision 1712/19-12-2016) is what the traffic act cites for access here, and it was read from the municipality's own «Κανονιστικές Αποφάσεις» page on 2026-09-25. 🚫 None of it becomes a window. Every permission in its Article 4 admits a named class of vehicle — an ambulance, a refuse truck, a resident with an off-street space, an Α.Μ.Α. badge holder, a concrete mixer on a permit — and a window would tell every driver that the street is open at that hour, which is exactly the error this corpus wrote down at Αργοστόλι. The classes are stated in `how_to_comply` instead.
🚨 And the regulation's own scope lands on the same undated fact the traffic act does, in two sentences that do not say the same thing. Its paragraph 1.1 applies it to designated pedestrian streets «που φέρουν τη σχετική σήμανση» — that bear the relevant signage — and to streets that are to be designated in future, «εξαιρουμένων αυτών για τους οποίους υπάρχει είτε θα εγκριθεί ιδιαίτερος Κανονισμός Λειτουργίας τους». Its paragraph 8.1 reaches «στους υπάρχοντες πεζόδρομους και σε οδούς που θα χαρακτηρισθούν ως πεζόδρομοι με μελλοντικές κανονιστικές αποφάσεις», with no signage condition at all. 🔑 This project cannot say what is standing at that junction, so it cannot say which of the regulation's two scope sentences reaches this stretch today. Both are quoted rather than chosen between. ✅ What can be said is that no separate regulation for this street was found and the traffic act cites the general one, which is the publisher's own answer to paragraph 1.1's carve-out.
🚨 Three other Thessaloniki streets were approved for exclusion in exactly this way and are deliberately absent, because their own acts say they are not yet in force. Οδός Αγνώστου Στρατιώτη between Ολύμπου and Αγίου Δημητρίου (ΦΕΚ Β' 4947/21.09.2022), and οδός Κορίνθου between Αιτωλικού and Παπάφη together with οδός Οδυσσιτών between Κορίνθου and Στρ. Γενναδίου (ΦΕΚ Β' 1225/07.03.2023), each carry the same clause suspending the regulations until the town-plan amendment completes, and this project found no planning act for any of them. 🚫 Their absence is not permission either — it is the publisher's own position that the procedure is unfinished.
⚠️ One stretch is not the city, and it is not even all of Thessaloniki's pedestrian streets. The municipality had a pedestrian-street regulation as early as 2016 and a 2018 gazette listed twenty-nine of its pedestrian streets by name, so the network is large and long-standing. This record holds the one conversion this project could source to both halves of the procedure that made it. 🚫 The absence of any other Thessaloniki street from this record is not permission to drive it.
Public holidays are not encoded, because neither act mentions them. Neither exempts a day or a date.
The schedule is derived from `hours` and carries no fact that is not in the two gazetted acts.
Operating times only, read from the source below. It does not check your vehicle.
This is a short street in central Thessaloniki that stopped being a street for cars, and it is here because the project could follow the conversion from end to end in the gazette — which is rarer in Greece than it sounds. 🔑 Greek law runs pedestrianisation as an «ενιαία διαδικασία», a single procedure with two halves that are published separately, and both halves of this one exist.
The traffic half is ΦΕΚ Β' 1828 of 26 March 2024, in which the Secretary of the Decentralised Administration of Macedonia and Thrace approved the municipal council's decision «όσον αφορά στον αποκλεισμό της κυκλοφορίας οχημάτων στο τμήμα της Δημοτικής οδού Ασημάκη Φωτήλα, μεταξύ των οδών Κατσάνου και Παπαδιαμαντοπούλου» — the exclusion of vehicle traffic from that stretch — and recorded that the approval covers «μόνο τα μόνιμα μέτρα ρύθμισης της κυκλοφορίας», permanent measures only.
The planning half is ΦΕΚ Δ' 749 of 1 November 2024, in which the Deputy Regional Governor for Infrastructure and Networks of Central Macedonia amended the town plan to designate the same stretch «ως πεζόδρομου», and whose Article 2 fixes force on publication with no condition attached. 🚨 The order matters more than it looks.
The traffic decision suspends itself until the planning one happens: it says in its own words «Οι κυκλοφοριακές ρυθμίσεις της παρούσης ισχύουν με την ολοκλήρωση της διαδικασίας τροποποίησης του ρυμοτομικού σχεδίου του υπό παρέμβαση οδικού τμήματος και εφαρμόζονται με την τοποθέτηση - εγκατάσταση της σχετικής κατακόρυφης - οριζόντιας σήμανσης».
Three other Thessaloniki streets carry the same approval and the same suspending sentence and have no planning act in the gazette, so they are not on this page and are not closed as far as this project can source. 🚨 Two limits belong next to all of that.
The second condition — the signs — cannot be dated from any published act, so what is written here is what the street legally is, not what is standing at the kerb. 🆕 And the municipality's own pedestrian-street regulation — «ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΑΣ ΠΕΖΟΔΡΟΜΩΝ ΔΗΜΟΥ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ», cited by the traffic act and approved by municipal council decision 1712/19-12-2016 — is now held and read.
It is not in the gazette and it never was: the municipality publishes it itself, as a PDF on its own «Κανονιστικές Αποφάσεις» page under the Διεύθυνση Έργων Αναπλάσεων και Συντηρήσεων Δημοσίου Χώρου. So who may drive here by exception is stated below, from the regulation's own Article 4, and is no longer a thing this page has to say it does not know. 🚨 The route to it is worth more than the document.
ΦΕΚ Β' 1828 prints the decision's ΑΔΑ as «7ΣΠΗΩΡ5-ΑΩ3», and that key returns nothing whatever in Διαύγεια; the decision is filed under «7ΣΠΗΩΡ5-Α3Ω», the last two characters the other way round.
Both were put to the register's own open-data search on 2026-09-25 — 0 results and 1 result, the one result being decision 1712/2016 ΑΔΣ of 19 December 2016 of Δήμος Θεσσαλονίκης, «την επανέγκριση του Κανονισμού Λειτουργίας πεζοδρόμων του Δήμου Θεσσαλονίκης». A published lookup key can be wrong, and a zero-result lookup on one is not evidence that the document does not exist.
Εθνικό Τυπογραφείο (National Printing House) — Εφημερίδα της Κυβερνήσεως, ΦΕΚ Δ' 749/01.11.2024, ΤΕΥΧΟΣ ΤΕΤΑΡΤΟ, item 3 of the issue: decision 652145(1657) of the Αντιπεριφερειάρχης Υποδομών και Δικτύων of the Περιφέρεια Κεντρικής Μακεδονίας, signed at Thessaloniki on 18 October 2024 by ΠΑΡΙΣΗΣ ΜΠΙΛΛΙΑΣ
Nothing is charged and there is nothing to buy. Neither act creates a zone entered on payment, a permit, a camera or a tariff, and the word «τέλος» appears in neither. A driver who is not entitled to be on this stretch is not short of a payment — the street is not for driving on, and the consequence is the Highway Code penalty recorded under `penalty`.
The conversion has no hours, and that is the instrument's own shape rather than a fact this project failed to find. A town-planning amendment does not set a timetable: it changes what a street is, permanently and at every hour, until another act changes it back.
ΦΕΚ Δ' 749/01.11.2024 prints no season, no weekday, no clock and no calendar date other than its own commencement. 🔑 What it does print, in Article 2, is the sentence most Greek traffic acts in this corpus withhold: «Η ισχύς της απόφασης αυτής αρχίζει από τη δημοσίευσή της» — force begins on publication.
The masthead of that issue reads «1 Νοεμβρίου 2024», and that is the date carried below; the gazette's own index dates the issue 2024-11-04, and the masthead is what this corpus quotes. 🚨 The traffic act's commencement is the more interesting of the two and it is a condition rather than a date.
ΦΕΚ Β' 1828/26.03.2024 states «Οι κυκλοφοριακές ρυθμίσεις της παρούσης ισχύουν με την ολοκλήρωση της διαδικασίας τροποποίησης του ρυμοτομικού σχεδίου του υπό παρέμβαση οδικού τμήματος και εφαρμόζονται με την τοποθέτηση - εγκατάσταση της σχετικής κατακόρυφης - οριζόντιας σήμανσης» — its regulations take effect when the town-plan amendment completes, and are applied when the vertical and horizontal signing is installed. 🔑 The first of those two conditions is exactly what ΦΕΚ Δ' 749 did, five months later, which is why this record can carry a real date at all. ⚠️ The second cannot be dated from anything published: no act names a signing programme, a contractor or a completion date, and this project holds nothing that says what stands at that junction today. 🆕 There is a second clock in this scheme, it has now been read, and it does not change the answer above.
The traffic act cites the municipality's «Κανονισμός λειτουργίας Πεζοδρόμων του Δήμου Θεσσαλονίκης», approved by decision 1712/19-12-2016 of the municipal council and ratified by document 3703/22-2-2017 of the Decentralised Administration, and the municipality publishes that regulation itself, on its own «Κανονιστικές Αποφάσεις» page. 🔑 It sets no hours for the street as such.
Its paragraph 3.5 forbids «η διέλευση, η στάση και η στάθμευση όλων των οχημάτων (μηχανοκίνητων, τρικύκλων, δικύκλων) στους πεζόδρομους και στις εισόδους τους καθ' όλο το 24ωρο» — passage, stopping and parking of every vehicle, at the entrances too, at every hour — and everything in its Article 4 is a permission for a named class of vehicle rather than an hour in which the street opens. 🚨 The one timetable it does print is a goods-loading timetable, and it is not the one in force.
Paragraph 4.5 opens «εφόσον δεν έχει με σχετική Απόφαση Δημοτικού Συμβουλίου καθοριστεί διαφορετικά» — unless otherwise fixed by a council decision — and then gives lorries of up to 8 tonnes payload four different bands according to where the pedestrian street is: 06:30–08:30 inside the commercial historic centre and its wider area, 02:30–08:30 on weekdays for the streets there that have exclusively commercial or other non-residential use, 06:30–08:30 and 20:30–22:30 for the streets outside it, and 06:00–07:30 for those adjoining school complexes, with «Αργίες ελεύθερα» in all four.
ΦΕΚ Β' 6645/06.12.2024 then fixed one band — 10:00 to 12:00, Monday to Saturday, up to 3.5 tonnes payload — for «όλους τους πεζόδρομους» of the municipality. ⚠️ Neither instrument mentions the other.
The 2024 decision repeals only provisions referring to decision 57/2018, and all seven occurrences of «κανονισ» in that issue were read on 2026-09-25 and belong to the unrelated first item of it, an EU agricultural-subsidy amendment. 🚫 So the later, municipality-wide act is what this page states for deliveries, and the regulation's own bands are recorded for what they are: earlier, differentiated by area, and not repealed in writing.
This project also does not place this stretch inside or outside the historic-centre perimeter the regulation draws in street names, because that would be its line and not the publisher's (D-096) — and under the 2024 act the answer is the same either way.
Εθνικό Τυπογραφείο — Εφημερίδα της Κυβερνήσεως, ΦΕΚ Δ' 749/01.11.2024, Article 2, the commencement clause, together with the commencement condition of ΦΕΚ Β' 1828/26.03.2024
One stretch of one street in the centre of Thessaloniki: οδός Ασημάκη Φωτήλα, between οδός Κατσάνου and οδός Παπαδιαμαντοπούλου.
Both acts name the same three streets in the same order and neither adds a length, a width, an area or a coordinate. 🔑 The operative words of the planning act are «Εγκρίνεται η τροποποίηση του εγκεκριμένου ρυμοτομικού σχεδίου του Δήμου Θεσσαλονίκης, με τον καθορισμό τμήματος της οδού Ασημάκη Φωτήλα, μεταξύ των οδών Κατσάνου και Παπαδιαμαντοπούλου, ως πεζόδρομου, στο πλαίσιο της ενιαίας διαδικασίας για τον πολεοδομικό και κυκλοφοριακό καθορισμό της εν λόγω οδού ως πεζόδρομου». 🚨 That last phrase — the unified procedure for the town-planning and traffic designation of the street as a pedestrian street — is the whole reason this record exists in the shape it does, and the gazette says where the procedure comes from: document Δ.Ο.Υ/2696/Φ252/18-05-2018 of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, «στο οποίο περιλαμβάνονται τόσο η κυκλοφοριακή όσο και η πολεοδομική ρύθμιση για τον καθορισμό πεζόδρομων». 🚫 The extent is given by street names and end points only.
A certified original coloured topographic diagram at 1:500 exists — Article 1 says it was endorsed by the Head of the Spatial Planning Section of the Region's General Directorate of Planning and Infrastructure and that it «συνοδεύει την απόφαση αυτή» — but, unlike the Alexandroupoli decree in this corpus, the act does not say that a photo-reduced copy is published with it, and no drawing page was found in the issue: read on 2026-09-24, all eight pages of ΦΕΚ Δ' 749 come out as continuous running text across its three unrelated items. 🚫 No boundary was derived from the street names: a line drawn between Κατσάνου and Παπαδιαμαντοπούλου would be this project's line rather than the publisher's, and D-096 forbids presenting it as the latter. ⚠️ The municipality this sits in is small relative to the conurbation — OpenStreetMap relation/1770680, «Δήμος Θεσσαλονίκης», has a furthest corner of 7.19 km — and the anchor this corpus holds for the city actually falls in the neighbouring Δήμος Νεάπολης - Συκεών, which is recorded in the city registry rather than hidden.
Εθνικό Τυπογραφείο — Εφημερίδα της Κυβερνήσεως, ΦΕΚ Δ' 749/01.11.2024, Article 1 of decision 652145(1657) and its recitals 20 to 22, which name the municipal council decisions and the ministerial document establishing the unified procedure
The authority's own map: Περιφέρεια Κεντρικής Μακεδονίας, Γενική Διεύθυνση Προγραμματισμού και Υποδομών…
This scheme sets no emission threshold, and the absence is structural rather than unrecorded. A pedestrianisation asks whether a vehicle may be on the street at all, not what comes out of its exhaust, and a town-planning amendment is further still from an emission instrument: it amends a ρυμοτομικό σχέδιο under the Basic Town Planning Code and the New Building Regulation, neither of which contains an emission criterion.
The same as for petrol, and for the same structural reason. No Euro class, fuel type or registration year appears anywhere in either act. Neither act measures any property of a vehicle at all — not weight, not length, not propulsion. The only question they ask is whether a vehicle is on that stretch.
Εθνικό Τυπογραφείο — Εφημερίδα της Κυβερνήσεως, ΦΕΚ Α' 100/13.06.2025: ν. 5209/2025, «Κώδικας Οδικής Κυκλοφορίας». Article 2 §56 for the definition of a pedestrian street and for the abutting-property entry and exit it allows; article 20 §4 and §8 β) for driving on one and for the category it falls in; article 108 §5 γ) and δ) for the tariff and the licence measures
Δήμος Θεσσαλονίκης (Municipality of Thessaloniki), Διεύθυνση Έργων Αναπλάσεων και Συντηρήσεων Δημοσίου Χώρου — «ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΑΣ ΠΕΖΟΔΡΟΜΩΝ ΔΗΜΟΥ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ», the regulation approved by municipal council decision 1712/19-12-2016 and ratified by document 3703/22-2-2017 of the Αποκεντρωμένη Διοίκηση Μακεδονίας - Θράκης, published by the municipality on its own «Κανονιστικές Αποφάσεις» page. Paragraph 3.5 for the baseline prohibition, 4.1 and 4.2 for the vehicle classes admitted round the clock, 4.4 for the limited-duration building and removals permit and the quiet hours, 4.6 and 4.7 for the tracked-vehicle and street-market prohibitions, 4.8 and 4.9 for the conditions on a permitted vehicle and the damage liability, 5.4 for the bollard keys and controls, and 3.3 for the sign at the entrance. 🔑 The first two steps on this list come from the gazette and the Code instead — ΦΕΚ Β' 1828/26.03.2024 for the exclusion and its conditions, ΦΕΚ Δ' 749/01.11.2024 for the designation, and ν. 5209/2025 article 2 §56 and article 20 §4 for the abutting-property access right and the general exception — and all three are cited in `sources`
Εθνικό Τυπογραφείο (National Printing House) — Εφημερίδα της Κυβερνήσεως, ΦΕΚ Δ' 749/01.11.2024, ΤΕΥΧΟΣ ΤΕΤΑΡΤΟ, item 3 of the issue: decision 652145(1657) of the Αντιπεριφερειάρχης Υποδομών και Δικτύων of the Περιφέρεια Κεντρικής Μακεδονίας, «Τροποποίηση του εγκεκριμένου ρυμοτομικού σχεδίου του Δήμου Θεσσαλονίκης για τον καθορισμό τμήματος της οδού Ασημάκη Φωτήλα, μεταξύ των οδών Κατσάνου και Παπαδιαμαντοπούλου, ως πεζόδρομου», made under article 29 of ν. 2831/2000 as replaced by article 10 of ν. 3044/2002, articles 152 to 160 of the Basic Town Planning Code (Δ' 580/1999) and article 31 of ν. 4067/2012, on municipal council decisions 214/03.04.2023 and 14/31.01.2024 and after the traffic approval of ΦΕΚ Β' 1828/26.03.2024; signed at Thessaloniki on 18 October 2024 by ΠΑΡΙΣΗΣ ΜΠΙΛΛΙΑΣ. THIS is the act that makes the stretch a pedestrian street, and its Article 2 is the only unconditional commencement clause in this record
Εθνικό Τυπογραφείο — Εφημερίδα της Κυβερνήσεως, ΦΕΚ Β' 1828/26.03.2024, ΤΕΥΧΟΣ ΔΕΥΤΕΡΟ, item 1 of the issue: decision 37094/12.03.2024 of the Γραμματέας of the Αποκεντρωμένη Διοίκηση Μακεδονίας - Θράκης, «Έγκριση της υπ' αρ. 14/2024 απόφασης του Δημοτικού Συμβουλίου (Δ.Σ) του Δήμου Θεσσαλονίκης όσον αφορά στο μέτρο ρύθμισης της κυκλοφορίας στα πλαίσια καθορισμού τμήματος της οδού Ασημάκη Φωτήλα … ως πεζόδρομου», signed at Thessaloniki on 12 March 2024 by ΙΩΑΝΝΗΣ ΣΑΒΒΑΣ. This is the traffic half of the unified procedure. It is cited for the exclusion itself, for its condition 5 that the approval covers permanent traffic measures only, for the clause that suspends its own regulations until the town-plan amendment completes and ties their application to the installation of signs, and for naming the municipality's own «Κανονισμός λειτουργίας Πεζοδρόμων» (decision 1712/19-12-2016, ratified by document 3703/22-2-2017) — a regulation that is not in the gazette because the municipality publishes it itself, and which was found and read on 2026-09-25 (fourth and fifth sources below). 🚨 It is also cited here for the ΑΔΑ it prints for that decision, «7ΣΠΗΩΡ5-ΑΩ3», which is one transposition away from the key the register actually files it under
Δήμος Θεσσαλονίκης (Municipality of Thessaloniki), Διεύθυνση Έργων Αναπλάσεων και Συντηρήσεων Δημοσίου Χώρου — «ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΑΣ ΠΕΖΟΔΡΟΜΩΝ ΔΗΜΟΥ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ», eight articles over twelve pages, the regulation approved by municipal council decision 1712/19-12-2016 and ratified by document 3703/22-2-2017 of the Αποκεντρωμένη Διοίκηση Μακεδονίας - Θράκης. THIS is the instrument the traffic act cites for who may drive on a Thessaloniki pedestrian street, and it is the source of every exception on this page. Article 1 for its scope, Article 3 for the definition, the 3.50 m emergency corridor, the sign at the entrance and the baseline 24-hour prohibition, Article 4 for the exceptions and the loading bands, Article 5 for the bollard keys, Article 6 for building works and Article 8 for its own commencement
Δήμος Θεσσαλονίκης — «Κανονιστικές Αποφάσεις», the municipality's own index of its regulatory decisions in force, listing «ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΑΣ ΠΕΖΟΔΡΟΜΩΝ» under the Διεύθυνση Έργων Αναπλάσεων και Συντηρήσεων Δημοσίου Χώρου and linking the PDF above. This is the provenance of that file — without it the regulation would be an anonymous document in an uploads folder — and it is also the only evidence this project holds that the 2016 text is the version the municipality still holds out as current: the page lists an amendment next to the cleanliness regulation and lists none next to this one. ⚠️ That is an argument from the publisher's own index, not a statement that no amendment exists
Διαύγεια (Diavgeia), the Greek national transparency register, open-data search endpoint — the register record of the approving decision: ΑΔΑ «7ΣΠΗΩΡ5-Α3Ω», protocol «1712/2016 ΑΔΣ», issued 19 December 2016 by Δήμος Θεσσαλονίκης (organizationUid 6114), subject «Εγκρίνει κατά πλειοψηφία την ορθή επανάληψη της υπ' αρ. 1058/2016 ΑΔΣ και την επανέγκριση του Κανονισμού Λειτουργίας πεζοδρόμων του Δήμου Θεσσαλονίκης, για τον καθορισμό των όρων και περιορισμών κυκλοφορίας». Cited for the identity, number and date of the decision the traffic act names, for the fact that 1712/2016 was a re-approval of an earlier decision 1058/2016, and for the measurement that the ΑΔΑ printed in ΦΕΚ Β' 1828 returns nothing here. 🚫 The register's own robots.txt forbids /doc/* and /decision/view, so the decision document itself is not fetched and is not cited; this endpoint is allowed and is what is used
Εθνικό Τυπογραφείο — Εφημερίδα της Κυβερνήσεως, ΦΕΚ Α' 100/13.06.2025: ν. 5209/2025, «Κώδικας Οδικής Κυκλοφορίας», the Greek Highway Code. Article 2 §56 defines «Πεζόδρομος» and the abutting-property access it allows; article 20 §4 prohibits driving on one; article 20 §8 β) classifies the breach as Ε3-Β and Σ; article 108 §5 γ) and δ) set the €350 fine and the licence and registration-document withdrawals
Next scheduled re-check: 2026-12-24.
A city can run more than one scheme, and they do not always answer the same question.